|
|
logo: clark c: 93 |
Protect Lake Whatcom ---
---It's Our Drinking Water
|
The following 21 goals were adopted as an attachment to the 1992 Joint Resolution signed by the City of Bellingham, Whatcom County, and Water District 10 legislative bodies.(*) Full-text of the Specific Goals Statements are available. |
What has been done?
|
How are they doing?
|
| Public Involvement and Education: | Actions: |
|
(1) Goal: To develop and incorporate mechanisms which:
|
A City PR person was hired; some brochures prepared.
A feeble webpage is posted in the FAQ.
An advisory committee on land acquisition was appointed by CoB; then disbanded. I am told another one was started, but who are they, and what do they do? One Sheriff's boat runs in the summer. (Unsure what WQ actions that can accomplish?) |
Score=
(does this separation help?)
|
| Watershed Ownership: | Actions: |
|
| (2) Goal: To pursue public ownership and protection of the watershed whenever possible through public/private partnerships, tax incentives, transfer of development rights, land trusts, grants, etc. | This was the topic of our 1999 Initiative. A limited version was passed by CoB about a year later, and properties have been bought by the City. The County and Sudden Valley have also acquired lands. There are still many acres that could be held in perpetual forestry. |
Score= "B" |
| Information/Data Management: | ||
| (3) Goal: To coordinate with appropriate agencies to maintain and expand a data base sufficient for detection of trends, assessment of problems, evaluation of actions, and forming management decisions that ensure protection and enhancement efforts are achieved. | (Detection - assessment - evaluation - ensure? I have not seen such a database.) |
Score= "D" |
|
Water Quality Protection and Enhancement:
Forest Practices |
Actions: |
|
(4) Goal: To
promote low impact forest practices in the watershed over residential
development while working to ensure that forest management practices
are conducted in harmony with the principles of a drinking-water
reservoir.
|
(I have not seen either -- zoning and development incentives -- nor -- the comprehensive watershed forest management plan. Logic suggests that almost all the forest is in the County, except the 15 City acres purchased near Silver Beach. ) |
Score= "F" |
| Hazardous Materials | Actions: |
|
(5) Goal: To
ensure that potential for water quality contamination associated
with the use and transport of hazardous materials in the watershed
is minimized.
|
There was action by local and state agencies when
the sewer interceptor overflowed and created "Fitz Creek" in 2000.
(Tell us about the other recommended components!) |
Score= "D" |
(6) Goal: To
reduce adverse water quality impacts from storage and handling
of hazardous materials within the watershed.
|
There is still a farm and what looks like a trucking business in Silver Beach.
|
Score= "F" |
| Nutrient Loading and Other Potential Threats: | Actions: |
|
| (7) Goal: To identify other sources of nutrient loading and other threats and implement measures to minimize impacts on the lake. | It is now well known that lawn fertilizers are one of the prime sources of chemicals which affect the water quality, via reduced D.O. The only action that has been taken to reduce these is the availability of the lake-friendly fertilizer blend. No report has been made of its utilization. |
Score= "D" |
| Recreation: | Actions: |
|
| (8) Goal: To allow recreational opportunities which do not adversely impact the watershed or water quality while finding appropriate ways to reduce impacts of existing activities. | Fossil-fueled engine and exhaust chemicals are known contaminants and carcinogens. A puny rule to long-term reduction of some engines was passed. |
Score= "D" |
| Solid Waste: | Actions: |
|
(9) Goal: To
ensure that the generation, handling, storage, or disposal of
solid waste does not degrade water quality.
|
The closure of the County's infamous "Y" Road landfill
was purposely done in a rush, to stay under obsolete standards, without any work to either improve the linings nor to evaluate the nature of materials dumped there.
After a citizen complaint to the State, it was given a cursory look by the State and County, and some local residential wells and shallow boreholes have had water quality tested. I have never seen a summary report; I have never seen work to identify/rule-out deep seepage into the aquifers which discharge into the lake. |
Score= "F" |
| Spill Response: | Actions: |
|
(10) Goal: To
ensure that spill prevention and response programs adequately
protect water quality.
|
What? Where? When? By Whom? |
Score= "D" or "F" |
| Stormwater: | Actions: |
|
(11) Goal: Prevent
water quality degradation and water quantity impacts associated
with stormwater runoff.
|
The City passed the Silver Beach Ordinance, which limits impervious surfaces for all new development, enforces seasonal limits on land disturbance activities and other important features. .
There has been some installation of stormwater retrofit projects in the Silver Beach area, The County has done work on a Cable Street facility.
New City developments now include stormwater detention gadgets. The City says they are the best available, but, who knows how well they work? Where is a real QC program, with measurement of chemical quality on the discharge side of these installations? |
Score= "C-" |
| Transportation: | Actions: |
|
(12) Goal: To
design and develop transportation and traffic systems within the
watershed to minimize the impacts on water quality.
|
The WTA restarted (token) bus service to Sudden Valley.
Thank goodness the infamous plan for a new connector road was shelved. There have been no new dead ends established. There is no evaluation program. The City now runs a street-sweeper, which picks up some contaminants before they can wash into the Lake. |
Score= "D" |
| Urbanization/Development: | Actions: |
|
(13) Goal: Prevent
water quality degradation associated with development within the
watershed.
|
The TDR programs results have been nil.
One proposal for a subdivision on the north shore was shelved. No agreed upon "level" has been set. |
Score= "F" |
| Wastewater Systems (Sewer and On-Site Waste Systems): | Actions: |
|
| (14) Goal: To prioritize the utilization of sewers over on-site systems in a manner consistent with management principles for a drinking-water reservoir environment. | We have not seen such a program, not even a formal restatement of these principles by any of the governments. |
Score= "F" |
(15) Goal: To
ensure that sewer systems promote, improve and protect water quality
without promoting growth.
|
Only the big "interceptor" on LL Road, which replaced the small one on LW Boulevard has been installed - itself controversial as
it provided the inherent ability for a substantial increase in urbanization!
No new local and collector sewer lines have been installed since about 1985. |
Score= "F" |
(16) Goal: To
ensure that accidental or intentional discharges of hazardous
materials and other contaminants to septic systems serving domestic
and commercial facilities do not adversely impact water quality.
|
We are told that an inspection program for all LWW septic systems is in the works. We need to hear reports of the results of such a program.
We have not heard of any citizen complaints about individual failing septic systems. (Tell us, County Health, and prove us wrong!) |
Score= "D" |
| Supply/Quantity Management: | ||
| Conservation | Actions: |
|
| (17) Goal: To promote the wise and efficient use of water through conservation for domestic, industrial, and commercial users. | Where is any general conservation program? One good program is the spots for future meters, with new construction. |
Score= "D" |
| Diversion Operation for Reservoir Management | Actions: |
|
| (18) Goal: To manage or reduce the diversion of water from the Nooksack River and Lake Whatcom in a manner consistent with water resource laws and to the extent possible, minimizes impacts on beneficial uses within the Nooksack Basin, with a particular emphasis on fisheries. | We gained a coincidental use-reduction when GP shut most of its operations. |
Score= "B" |
| Recharge | Actions: |
|
(19) Goal: Where
it does not conflict with water quality goals and objectives,
identify and promote beneficial recharge practices within the
watershed and assist in maintaining supplies for all beneficial
uses (e.g., stream buffers, encouraging minimum impervious surfaces
within watershed, etc.).
|
No recharge practices program - neither residential nor global.
The closest is the CoB SB ordinance for impervious surfaces. No stream monitoring. |
Score= "F" |
| Demand: | Actions: |
|
|
Distribution/Availability within the County
(20) Goal: Given the importance of Lake Whatcom and its Middle Fork Diversion as a source of water supply, and the limited availability of alternative sources to support anticipated growth in the county, establish a process to determine the extent to which the Lake Whatcom reservoir water should be made available beyond the Bellingham Urban Area. |
As part of the WRIA-1 Program, water needs and rights have been tabulated, county-wide.
Furnishing of City water to County properties has been largely curtailed, a good move - pending full GMA and urban-infill and expansion policies. |
Score= "C" |
| Other: | Actions: |
|
|
Fish and Wildlife
(21) Goal: Promote actions and programs that protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat to include:
|
We are not aware of any actions. The agencies are encouraged to publicize them, and tell us. |
Score= "F" |
|
|
|
Update note - 2006 (Twelve years after passage of this Resolution!)
You - the public - are asked to contribute to this ScoreCard. There is NO WAY that one person, the webmaster alone, can keep up-to-date on the myriad aspects of this challenge. If you know of an activity which benefits the Lake, please report it in a verifiable way, and (to help immensely the update task) when you report it say WHICH GOAL it applies to. Some elected officials have replied to this call. Their unedited reports are here on a sub-page. Thanks, leave a message for the webmaster |
|
The Initiative Group -- Whatcom
Our bottom-line principles are: Protect the water supply in perpetuity -- maintain ecological viability of the lake for natural species -- distribute the financial burden fairly among those benefitting -- take immediate action if prudent -- take definitive action -- avoid actions which cut off future options. |
1992 Resolution Back to the LW HomePage leave a message from the website page URL: href="LakeWhatcom.org/goals21score.htm" Bellingham, Washington 98226 --- The Fourth Corner of the USA table expanded Nov 26, 2006 -- last edited Dec 23, 2006 -- mgb c: 94 |